Supreme Court hears critical case on Temporary Protected Status
最高法院審理關於臨時保護身份的關鍵案件
Supreme Court is currently reviewing a pivotal case, Mullin v.
Dahlia Doe），涉及臨時保護身份（TPS）的未來。
Established in 1990, TPS provides legal residency and work permits to individuals from nations experiencing armed conflict or natural disasters.
川普政府曾試圖終止成千上萬移民的這項身份，從而引發了重大的法律戰。
The Trump administration sought to terminate this status for hundreds of thousands of immigrants, sparking a major legal battle.
其核心爭議在於聯邦法院是否擁有監督國土安全部（DHS）關於 TPS 決策的權限。
The central question is whether federal courts possess the authority to oversee the Department of Homeland Security's decisions regarding TPS.
政府主張這些決定屬於行政裁量權範疇，而原告則聲稱政府未能遵循必要的法律程序。
Furthermore, the case involves allegations of racial bias, as plaintiffs argue the terminations were motivated by discriminatory animus.
由於直接影響了約35萬名海地人與7千名敘利亞人，若最高法院作出對政府有利的判決，可能會影響全球17個國家、共計超過130萬人。
The Court's decision, expected by June 2026, could significantly expand executive power over immigration policy while stripping away judicial oversight.
在數百萬人的命運懸而未決之際，該案的最終判決將重塑美國移民法的格局。
As millions of lives hang in the balance, the final judgment will reshape the landscape of U.S. immigration law.
