Nintendo seeks dismissal of lawsuit over tariff fees
任天堂請求駁回關稅費用訴訟
更新於: 2026年7月22日 上午12:30
Nintendo is currently facing a class-action lawsuit as it seeks to dismiss claims that it should share U.S. government tariff refunds with its customers.
任天堂目前正面臨一場集體訴訟，並試圖駁回有關其應與消費者分享美國政府關稅退款的指控。
Supreme Court ruled in February 2026 that certain tariffs were unlawful, prompting Nintendo to recover the fees it had paid to the government.
隨後，消費者提起訴訟，主張由於該公司為抵銷關稅於2025年調漲產品價格，保留政府退款構成了「雙重獲利」。
Shortly after, consumers sued Nintendo, arguing that because the company raised product prices in 2025 to offset those tariffs, keeping the government refund constitutes 'double-dipping.'
任天堂正推動駁回此案，堅稱初始購買為合法商業協議，消費者均同意支付定價。
Nintendo is pushing for the case's dismissal, asserting that the initial purchases were valid commercial agreements where consumers agreed to pay the set price.
他們認為客戶對退款無法律權利，且價格調漲是受整體市場條件影響，而非單純因關稅成本。
They argue that customers have no legal right to a rebate and that the price hikes were influenced by broader market conditions rather than solely tariff costs.
儘管FedEx等部分物流公司已承諾退款，任天堂堅持其並無法律義務採取相同行動。
While some logistics companies like FedEx have pledged refunds, Nintendo maintains it is under no legal obligation to do so.
此爭議已造成任天堂股價顯著震盪。
This dispute has caused noticeable volatility in Nintendo's stock.
訴訟結果尚未確定，但此情況映照了亞馬遜與福特等其他大型企業在應對關稅後法律環境複雜性時所面臨的類似挑戰。
The outcome remains uncertain, but it mirrors similar challenges faced by other major corporations like Amazon and Ford as they navigate the complexities of post-tariff legal landscapes.
