最高法院審理關於臨時保護身份的關鍵案件
Supreme Court hears critical case on Temporary Protected Status
美國聯邦最高法院目前正在審理一起關鍵訴訟，馬林訴達利亞·多伊案（Mullin v.
The U.S.
TPS 於1990年設立，為經歷武裝衝突或自然災害的國家的公民提供合法居留權與工作許可。
Dahlia Doe, concerning the future of Temporary Protected Status (TPS).
川普政府曾試圖終止成千上萬移民的這項身份，從而引發了重大的法律戰。
Established in 1990, TPS provides legal residency and work permits to individuals from nations experiencing armed conflict or natural disasters.
其核心爭議在於聯邦法院是否擁有監督國土安全部（DHS）關於 TPS 決策的權限。
The Trump administration sought to terminate this status for hundreds of thousands of immigrants, sparking a major legal battle.
此外，該案還涉及種族偏見的指控，原告指出終止該身份的行為是出於歧視性動機。
The government argues that these determinations are matters of executive discretion, while plaintiffs claim the administration failed to follow required legal procedures.
由於直接影響了約35萬名海地人與7千名敘利亞人，若最高法院作出對政府有利的判決，可能會影響全球17個國家、共計超過130萬人。
Furthermore, the case involves allegations of racial bias, as plaintiffs argue the terminations were motivated by discriminatory animus.
法院預計將於2026年6月作出裁決，這項判決可能會顯著擴大行政機關在移民政策上的權力，並削弱司法監督。
With approximately 350,000 Haitians and 7,000 Syrians directly affected, a ruling in favor of the administration could potentially impact over 1.3 million people across 17 countries.
在數百萬人的命運懸而未決之際，該案的最終判決將重塑美國移民法的格局。
The Court's decision, expected by June 2026, could significantly expand executive power over immigration policy while stripping away judicial oversight.
