白宮新政策提議變更研究經費撥款方式
New White House Policy Proposes Changes to Research Funding
Updated at: July 29, 2026 at 02:00 AM
在2026年7月，白宮對美國聯邦研究資金進行了重大重組，旨在將重心從傳統的學術主導模式，轉向更具中央政治監督的體系。
In July 2026, the White House introduced a major restructuring of U.S. federal research funding, aiming to pivot away from traditional academic-led models toward a system with more centralized political oversight.
該政策在諸如《科學：新黃金時代》 等文件中概述，將現有體系描述為「鈣化」 的，並建議進行根本性的變革。
Outlined in documents like "Science: The New Golden Age," the policy characterizes existing systems as "calcified" and suggests a need for fundamental change.
管理與預算辦公室 (OMB) 的一項關鍵提案要求資深政治任命官員審查並可能終止研究補助金，批評者擔心此舉將使科學探究政治化。
A key proposal from the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) mandates that senior political appointees review and potentially terminate research grants, a move critics fear will politicize scientific inquiry.
此外，該政策將財政支持從大型大學轉向個別科學家和任務導向實體（如 X-Labs），同時優先考慮專注於物理科學領域人工智慧的「創世紀任務」。
Additionally, the policy shifts financial support from major universities toward individual scientists and mission-driven entities like X-Labs, while prioritizing the "Genesis Mission," which focuses on artificial intelligence in physical sciences.
行政部門還提議削減美國國家科學基金會 (NSF) 和美國國家衛生研究院 (NIH) 等主要機構的經費，同時對補助金的使用方式施加新限制，包括禁止支付期刊出版費用。
The administration also proposes cuts to major agencies such as the NSF and NIH, while imposing new restrictions on how grants are utilized, including a ban on paying for journal publication fees.
這些全面性的變革引發了科學界和學術機構的強烈反彈，他們警告稱，將政治立場置於績效導向的同儕審查之上，可能會扼殺創新並削弱國家基礎研究的能力。
These sweeping changes have sparked significant backlash from scientific communities and academic institutions, which warn that prioritizing political alignment over merit-based peer review could stifle innovation and weaken the nation’s foundational research capacity.
預計最終法規將在2026年底前顯著影響研究格局。
The final regulations are expected to influence the research landscape significantly by late 2026.
