蘋果公司因專利訴訟被判賠償數十億美元

Apple ordered to pay billions in patent lawsuit

Updated at: September 27, 2026 at 02:45 AM

2026年9月26日,美國聖地牙哥聯邦陪審團做出具指標性的裁決,下令蘋果(Apple)公司因侵犯專利需支付57.2億美元。

On September 26, 2026, a U.S. federal jury in San Diego delivered a landmark verdict, ordering Apple to pay $5.72 billion for patent infringement.

noun聖地牙哥
noun裁決
noun蘋果
verb侵犯
noun專利

這項被視為美國史上金額最高的專利賠償裁決,源自於與Taction Technology Inc.

This ruling, recognized as the largest patent award in U.S. history, stems from a legal battle with Taction Technology Inc. over the "Taptic Engine" found in iPhones and Apple Watches.

noun專利
verb賠償
noun裁決

之間針對iPhone與Apple Watch所使用的「觸覺引擎(Taptic Engine)」的法律訴訟。

Taction claimed Apple violated two of its patents regarding low-frequency vibration technology.

nouniPhone

Taction聲稱蘋果侵犯了其關於低頻震動技術的兩項專利。

Although the damages are record-breaking, the jury noted that Apple’s infringement was not "willful," which spares the company from potentially having the fine tripled.

noun蘋果
verb侵犯
noun專利

儘管賠償金額打破紀錄,陪審團指出蘋果的侵權行為並非「蓄ㄒㄩˋ意ㄧˋ」,這讓蘋果免於賠償金可能被增加至三倍的風險。

The road to this verdict was long.

verb賠償
noun蘋果
noun蘋果
verb賠償

這項裁決之路漫長,該案最初於2021年提起,2023年曾遭駁回,隨後於2025年被聯邦上訴法院發回重審。

Initially filed in 2021, the case was dismissed in 2023, only to be revived by a federal appeals court in 2025.

noun裁決
adjective漫長
verb上訴

蘋果堅稱其技術為獨立開發,且與Taction的技術本質不同,並堅決否認有任何不法行為。

Apple, maintaining that its technology was independently developed and fundamentally different from Taction’s, has firmly denied any wrongdoing.

noun蘋果

這家科技巨頭已誓言發動強勢上訴。

The tech giant has vowed to launch an aggressive appeal.

verb上訴

法律專家認為,雖然目前的數字令人震驚,但如此龐大的賠償金在後續的上訴審查中被削減或撤銷是很常見的。

Legal experts suggest that while the current figure is staggering, it is common for such massive awards to be reduced or overturned during subsequent appellate reviews.

adjective震驚
verb賠償
verb上訴
🎉

End of article

You read 9 focus sentences.

Challenge Mode

Comprehension Questions

針對蘋果提起訴訟的主要原因為何?

✓

Correct Choice

侵犯與觸覺引擎(Taptic Engine)相關的專利。

蘋果在最近的裁決中被下令支付多少金額?

✓

Correct Choice

57.2億美元。

將侵權行為認定為「非蓄意」為何很重要?

✓

Correct Choice

這避免了賠償金額可能被增加至三倍的風險。

該案件在2023年發生了什麼事?

✓

Correct Choice

聯邦法官最初駁回了該案件。

蘋果對於該裁決的官方立場為何?

✓

Correct Choice

他們否認相關指控,並打算對該決定提起上訴。

Ringoo Icon

Learn faster with Ringoo apps

Trace your learning progress and get real-time feedback with interactive exercises.